|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 13-19
Dermatoscopy of nonvenereal genital dermatoses: A brief review
Divya Kamat, Keshavamurthy Vinay
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
|Date of Web Publication||10-May-2019|
Dr. Keshavamurthy Vinay
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh - 160 012
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The scope of dermatoscopy has now vastly expanded and shows promising use for characterization of both pigmentary and inflammatory dermatoses affecting the skin, nail, and mucosae. Due to concerns of contamination and spread of infection, dermatoscopy has not been widely studied for genital mucosal dermatoses. In this article, we review the dermatoscopic features of nonvenereal dermatosis affecting the genitalia. Although biopsy is required for a definitive diagnosis, dermatoscopy is useful to identify atypical and suspicious pigmentary lesions. For the inflammatory dermatoses and other benign dermatoses, presence of few characteristic findings can aid in the diagnosis.
Keywords: Dermatoscopy, genitalia, mucoscopy, nonvenereal dermatoses
|How to cite this article:|
Kamat D, Vinay K. Dermatoscopy of nonvenereal genital dermatoses: A brief review. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2019;40:13-9
| Introduction|| |
Dermatoscopy has now become an integral part of the dermatologist's armamentarium. It serves as a useful noninvasive adjunct to clinical examination for both pigmented and other nonpigmented dermatoses. For the diagnosis of melanoma, it was found that the diagnostic accuracy was 15.6 times higher with the use of a dermatoscope than visual inspection alone. This has led to the incorporation of dermatoscopy training as part of residency programs. Gradually, the scope of dermatoscopy has expanded to inflammatory and pigmentary diseases and has now been used to study the diseases of nails (onychoscopy) and mucosa (mucoscopy).
Dermatoscope provides a magnification of ×10 and employs a glass plate. Both contact and noncontact methods can be used, and a cross-polarized filter helps to better visualize the deeper structures. Dermatologists were reluctant to routinely perform mucoscopy due to concerns regarding direct contact of the footplate with the mucosa and transmission of infections. However, innovative measures such as use of cling films and barrier footplates have now circumvented these concerns [Figure 1]., In this article, we briefly review the published literature on genital mucoscopy [Table 1].
|Table 1: Characteristic dermatoscopic features of few nonvenereal genital dermatoses|
Click here to view
| Normal Physiological Lesions of the Genitalia|| |
It is considered to be an anatomical variant of the vestibular mucosa but is often confused with genital warts causing unnecessary interventions. It is the female counterpart of pearly penile papules. Clinically, it is seen in the inner aspect of the labia minora as filiform projections. On dermatoscopy, it appears as transparent papillae with prominent fibrovascular core containing irregular vascular channels [Figure 2]a. Bases of the individual papillae remain separate. Dermatoscopy of genital warts demonstrates multiple irregular projections with tapering ends, which are less transparent and broader than vestibular papillomatosis [Figure 2]b. The papillary projections arise from a common base. Hemorrhagic lesions in the form of black and red dots and streaks are also seen.
|Figure 2: (a) Dermatoscopy of vestibular papillomatosis, translucent white papillomatous projections with vascular core. Bases of the individual papillae remain separate (DermLite-DL3N, ×10) (b) Dermatoscopy of genital warts, multiple irregular projections with tapering ends, which are less transparent and broader than vestibular papillomatosis. The papillary projections arise from a common base (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Pearly penile papules
They are benign physiological structures present in a ring around the corona glandularis. They are also mistaken for condyloma accuminata. On dermatoscopy, they appear as white, slightly transparent cobblestone-like projections, with the central vascular core being comma shaped or can appear as a central dot [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Pearly penile papules arranged circumferentially around the corona. Clear projections with central vascular core can be appreciated on dermoscopy (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Sebaceous gland hyperplasia
The modified sebaceous glands found over the prepuce and distal to it are called Tyson's glands. Sebaceous hyperplasia or ectopic sebaceous glands are commonly seen in the vermillion border of lips. In the genitalia, they are seen as pink-to-yellowish, tiny papules with umbilication. On dermoscopy, they appear as well-defined, yellowish structures with milky white ovoid material, which is slightly transparent [Figure 4]. They are surrounded by wreath-like nonarborizing vessels. Similar lesions can be seen at the mucocutaneous junction of the labia minora in females.
|Figure 4: Dermatoscopy of sebaceous hyperplasia showing multiple yellowish discrete structures with whitish center seen on stretching the skin over the shaft of the penis (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Pigmented lesions involving the genital mucosa are seen in around 10% of Caucasian women. In males, it involves the glans penis and in females, the vulva. This includes melanotic macules or lentigenosis, nevi, melanoma, angiokeratoma, seborrheic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
Melanotic macules or melanosis are the most frequent pigmented lesions observed in the genital mucosa. It is thought to be a disorder of melanocyte transfer to the epidermal keratinocytes. They have a predilection for the nonkeratinized mucosal areas rather than the hair-bearing areas of the external genitalia. They are benign pigmented macules, which are characterized on histopathology by increased basal layer pigmentation. It usually affects persons with skin types IV, V, and VI. They clinically present as single or multiple macules of color ranging from light brown to black and can range in size from 1 mm to 1 cm [Figure 5]a. They can often be mistaken for mucosal melanoma. However, standard algorithms such as ABCDE-asymmetry, borders, color, diameter, evolution; might not be suitable for evaluating genital pigmented macules. Various patterns have been described on dermatoscopy as follows:
|Figure 5: (a) Mucosal melanosis showing multiple brownish macules of size 4 cm × 3 cm over the glans penis and prepuce. (b) Dermatoscopy of mucosal melanosis showing reticular brownish structures appearing honeycomb like in some areas (DermLite-DL3N, ×10). (c) Parallel pattern – Streaks of brownish pigment appearing as parallel lines (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
- Ring-like pattern: Multiple ovoid structures with hyperpigmented borders appearing like grapes in some areas
- Parallel pattern: This can be seen in typical small macules affecting the lips, glans, and vulva. The pigment streaks are arranged in regular parallel lines [Figure 5]b
- Structureless pattern: Here, structureless pigmented areas are seen with color ranging from light brown to dark blue-gray. Clinically, these macules are slightly larger in diameter
- Reticular or honeycomb: Similar to reticular pattern of cutaneous nevi where the pigment appears in a round-to-ovoid honeycomb pattern [Figure 5]c
- Globular pattern: Round-to-ovoid dark brown globular structures.,
These are even more uncommon, with the prevalence of vulvar nevi being 2.3% among cases of melanocytic nevi. A subset of vulvar nevi have peculiar features on histopathology and are termed atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type (AMNGT). Vulvar nevi are usually present in childhood in contrast to AMNGT, which is seen in women of reproductive age group. Vulvar nevi are flat or dome-shaped papules ranging from pink to dark brown-black or blue in color. They have regular borders and are uniformly pigmented. The globular and homogenous patterns are most frequently described on dermoscopy. In addition, milia-like cysts may also be seen. Other patterns such as parallel and cobblestone are also seen and are sometimes difficult to distinguish from vulvar melanosis which have similar patterns. At times, mixed patterns and peripheral streak-like pigmentation might raise the suspicion of a melanoma, and histopathology is advised to resolve this., Divided nevi or kissing nevi of the penis, a type of congenital melanocytic nevi, have also been reported. This is a single nevus initially, which splits after epidermis invaginates to form the corona sulcus. Dermatoscopic features similar to cutaneous congenital melanocytic nevi such as dots and globules have been reported. In a study on genital melanocytic nevi, the authors found that majority of the dermoscopic features were similar to that of cutaneous melanocytic nevi. However, in some cases, differentiation between melanosis and melanocytic nevi and between benign and malignant melanocytic tumors was not possible by dermatoscopy alone. The practice of routine prophylactic biopsies of melanocytic nevi especially in children should be discouraged in the absence of any worrisome features clinically and on dermatoscopy.
Atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type
This accounts for 5% of all the benign melanocytic areas of the genitalia. The key histopathological features are as follows:
- Nested pattern: Round-to-ovoid nests of melanocytes of variable size which are oriented perpendicular or parallel to the dermoepidermal junction
- Dyshesive nest pattern: Contiguous dyscohesive melanocytic nests which separate the epidermis from the dermal melanocytes
- Crowded pattern: Closely arranged ill-defined nests of melanocytes which obscure the dermoepidermal junction.
Mixed pattern on dermatoscopy is most frequently seen. Parallel lines appear together with structureless areas or brown-to-black globules., Blue-white veil and irregular dots have also been described. All cases with a mixed pattern on dermoscopy must undergo biopsy to rule out melanoma.
| Benign Tumors|| |
Pigmented seborrheic keratosis, like its cutaneous counterpart, shows features like polypoidal structures, cerebriform pattern, and fat finger-like structures on dermatoscopy. Comedone-like openings, which are keratin-filled invaginations, are not seen in genital seborrheic keratosis due to constant friction. Milia-like cysts are commonly seen as they are embedded within the epidermis.,
They are rare tumors composed of lipid-laden macrophages, which clinically present as yellowish plaques and nodules with papillomatous surface in the anogenital areas. On dermatoscopy, numerous coalescing yellowish mulberry-like papules are seen with central hairpin-like vessels.,
| Premalignant Conditions|| |
Extramammary Paget's disease
Extramammary Paget's disease is characterized clinically by erythematous plaques with oozing, ulceration, and scaling with nodules and focal hyperpigmentation. Areas of hypopigmentation may also be seen [Figure 6]a. On dermoscopy, milky red areas, vascular patterns, surface scales, ulcers, pigmentary structures, shiny white lines, and white structureless areas are observed in extramammary Paget's disease [Figure 6]b. The common vascular patterns noted are dotted vessels and glomeruloid vessels. Pigmented Paget's disease is often mistaken for melanoma because of features such as irregular pigmented globules; white, negative pigment network; and structureless blue-gray areas.
|Figure 6: (a) Well-defined erosion over the labia minora. On histopathology, diagnosis of primary extramammary Paget's disease was confirmed. (b) Dermatoscopy of the lesion showing intense erythema, milky white areas, and glomeruloid vessels (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Erythroplasia of Queyrat
It is the genital counterpart of cutaneous Bowen's disease and shares similar dermatoscopic features. Glomeruloid vessels arranged in clusters or in a diffuse pattern are characteristic and are used to differentiate erythroplasia of Queyrat from other causes of chronic balanitis. In addition, linear vessels and brown dots may also be seen. Dermatoscopic features in pigmented Bowen's disease include pigmented streaks in association with other findings such as comedo-like openings.
Vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
This is a common cause for genital pruritus. Around 15% of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia is clinically pigmented. Typical findings are milky white to pink areas associated with dotted and glomerular vessels and papillomatous structures. In the pigmented variant, brownish dots with well-defined borders and a cerebriform appearance may be seen.
| Malignant Tumors|| |
Vulvar melanomas account for 1%–3% of all melanomas seen in women. They frequently occur in older women and present as flat or raised pigmented lesions, which are often more than 7 mm in size. Amelanotic variants have also been described. Multiple colors and multicomponent patterns characterize the dermatoscopic appearance of mucosal melanomas., Presence of blue, gray, and white colors with or without structureless areas had 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma. Reticular depigmentation and network of fine whitish lines are valuable in diagnosing early vulvar melanoma. In amelanotic melanoma, whitish- to skin-colored papules with polymorphous vessels are seen on dermoscopy. Asymmetry, multiple patterns, focal areas with blue-white veil, and presence of vessels should raise a suspicion of malignancy and must be confirmed by histopathology.
Basal cell carcinoma
Dermoscopy of genital BCC is similar to cutaneous BCC showing blue-gray ovoid globules, whitish homogenous structures, and arborizing vessels. Nonpigmented lesions are difficult to diagnose and can mimic inflammatory lesions. Here, well-focused arborizing vessels help to clinch the diagnosis.
| Vascular Lesions|| |
Angiokeratoma of Fordyce appears as multiple, well-defined, bluish black papules over the scrotum [Figure 7]a. They are often clinically mistaken for genital nevi, blue nevus, and melanoma. A report found that 20% of angiokeratomas were misdiagnosed as melanoma. On dermatoscopy, well-defined, reddish-to-dark blue lacunae with bluish-white veil can be seen [Figure 7]b.
|Figure 7: (a) Multiple well-defined, skin-colored-to-bluish nodular lesions of angiokeratoma over the scrotum. (b) Dermatoscopy shows reddish blue lacunae within the nodules. Scaling and hemorrhage are also seen (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Acquired lymphedema and lymphangiectasia of the vulva usually arise due to damage to the lymphatics occurring after trauma, infections, malignancy, surgery, radiation, etc. Clinically, they present as flesh-colored papules or clear vesicles with a diffuse erythematous background. Puncturing the lesion can lead to discharge of clear fluid. On dermatoscopy, well-defined, round-to-oval reddish lacunae with whitish septa and numerous tiny punctiform lacunae are seen. This is similar to the appearance of lymphangioma circumscriptum. Dermatoscopy is useful when the lesions are sometimes confused with verruca or molluscum contagiosum.
| Inflammatory Disorders|| |
In this condition, well-defined, reddish plaques are seen over the glans or inner side of the prepuce [Figure 8]a. Dermoscopy characteristically shows homogenous reddish orange areas with curved vessels [Figure 8]b. The orange areas correspond to the hemosiderin deposition, and the curved vessels represent vascular proliferation. Other types of vascular structures seen are serpiginous vessels and convoluted, chalice-shaped, linear and dotted vessels.
|Figure 8: (a) Plasma cell balanitis showing well-defined erosion over the glans penis. (b) Dermatoscopy shows orange structureless areas with curved and serpiginous vessels (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Cottage cheese-like structures representing the fungal colonies and blurry linear vessels are characteristic of candidal balanitis.
Multiple erythematous papules and plaques are seen clinically. On dermoscopy, homogeneously distributed, dilated, and dotted vessels on an erythematous background are seen.
Thick, linear, and irregular hairpin-like vessels are seen diffusely over the lichen planus lesions. Wickham's striae are characteristically noted on an intense red background.
Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus
Ivory white atrophic plaques are seen over the glans and labia minora with destruction of the normal anogenital architecture [Figure 9]a. On dermatoscopy, white structures which also appear pinkish are seen, which correspond to sclerosis on histopathology. Gray-blue dots are arranged in peppering pattern, which corresponds to the dermal melanophages. Marked decrease in the concentration of vessels and presence of polymorphic patterns of vessels are the hallmark features [Figure 9]b. Purpuric-to-red globules and blotches are seen especially in females, which correspond to the blood spots due to excessive scratching.
|Figure 9: (a) Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus showing depigmented atrophic plaque with erosions over the glans penis. (b) Dermatoscopy shows white streaky structureless areas and gray-blue dots in peppering pattern, and polymorphous vessels can be appreciated (DermLite-DL3N, ×10)|
Click here to view
Lichen simplex chronicus
It is a chronic pruritic disorder characterized by lichenification, with varying degrees of excoriation caused by scratching and rubbing. The skin progressively thickens and becomes grayish brown. On dermoscopy, whitish gray structures with rich vascularization are seen. Vessels can be seen as linear, dotted, and serpentine patterns.
| Conclusion|| |
Dermatoscopy has gained importance in the diagnosis of nonpigmented dermatoses and to differentiate the benign lesions from ambiguous and malignant lesions., Many dermatologists in today's practice have incorporated dermatoscopy as a routine. Though it does not obviate the need for biopsy, it is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions. It also helps us to carefully select the site for biopsy for suspicious or atypical pigmented lesions.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Venugopal SS, Soyer HP, Menzies SW. Results of a nationwide dermoscopy survey investigating the prevalence, advantages and disadvantages of dermoscopy use among Australian dermatologists. Australas J Dermatol 2011;52:14-8.
Grover C, Jakhar D. Onychoscopy: A practical guide. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:536-49.
] [Full text]
Jakhar D, Grover C. Innovative modification of the USB dermatoscope for mucoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;78:e3-4.
Sorrell J, Lauren CT. Use of transparent film dressing for dermoscopy of mucosal lesions. Pediatr Dermatol 2016;33:107-8.
Borghi A, Virgili A, Corazza M. Dermoscopy of inflammatory genital diseases: Practical insights. Dermatol Clin 2018;36:451-61.
Kim SH, Seo SH, Ko HC, Kwon KS, Kim MB. The use of dermatoscopy to differentiate vestibular papillae, a normal variant of the female external genitalia, from condyloma acuminata. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:353-5.
Ozkur E, Falay T, Turgut Erdemir AV, Gurel MS, Leblebici C. Vestibular papillomatosis: An important differential diagnosis of vulvar papillomas. Dermatol Online J 2016;22. pii: 13030/qt7933q377.
Ozeki M, Saito R, Tanaka M. Dermoscopic features of pearly penile papules. Dermatology 2008;217:21-2.
Ena P, Origa D, Massarelli G. Sebaceous gland hyperplasia of the foreskin. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009;34:372-4.
Cengiz FP, Emiroglu N, Wellenhof RH. Dermoscopic and clinical features of pigmented skin lesions of the genital area. An Bras Dermatol 2015;90:178-83.
Virgili A, Zampino MR, Marzola A, Corazza M. Vulvar melanocytic nevi: A dermoscopic investigation. Dermatology 2010;221:55-62.
Ferrari A, Buccini P, Covello R, De Simone P, Silipo V, Mariani G, et al.
The ringlike pattern in vulvar melanosis: A new dermoscopic clue for diagnosis. Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1030-4.
Mannone F, De Giorgi V, Cattaneo A, Massi D, De Magnis A, Carli P. Dermoscopic features of mucosal melanosis. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:1118-23.
Bombonato C, Longo C, Piana S, Moscarella E. Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy patterns of mucosal melanosis. Pigment Int 2017;4:21. [Full text]
Ferrari A, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Buccini P, De Simone P, Silipo V, et al.
Dermoscopy of pigmented lesions of the vulva: A retrospective morphological study. Dermatology 2011;222:157-66.
Godinho N, Nai GA, Schaefer AL, Schaefer LV. Kissing nevus of the penis: A case report and dermatoscopic findings. An Bras Dermatol 2017;92:95-7.
Hunt RD, Orlow SJ, Schaffer JV. Genital melanocytic nevi in children: Experience in a pediatric dermatology practice. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:429-34.
Gleason BC, Hirsch MS, Nucci MR, Schmidt BA, Zembowicz A, Mihm MC Jr., et al.
Atypical genital nevi. A clinicopathologic analysis of 56 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:51-7.
Nath AK, Kumari R, Rajesh G, Thappa DM, Basu D. Giant seborrheic keratosis of the genitalia. Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:310-2.
] [Full text]
Arzberger E, Oliveira A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Zalaudek I, Cerroni L, Komericki P. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy in verruciform xanthoma of the glans penis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:e147-9.
Ogata D, Tsuchida T. Characteristic dermoscopic features of verruciform xanthoma: Report of three cases. J Dermatol 2015;42:1103-4.
Mun JH, Park SM, Kim GW, Song M, Kim HS, Ko HC, et al.
Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of extramammary Paget disease: A study of 35 cases. Br J Dermatol 2016;174:1104-7.
Coras-Stepanek B, von Portatius A, Dyall-Smith D, Stolz W. Dermatoscopy of pigmented extramammary Paget disease simulating melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:e144-6.
Errichetti E, Lallas A, Di Stefani A, Apalla Z, Kyrgidis A, Lacarrubba F, et al.
Accuracy of dermoscopy in distinguishing erythroplasia of Queyrat from common forms of chronic balanitis: Results from a multicentric observational study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jdv. 15359. [Epub ahead of print].
Mota AN, Piñeiro-Maceira J, Alves Mde F, Tarazona MJ. Pigmented Bowen's disease. An Bras Dermatol 2014;89:825-7.
Barisani A, Dika E, Fanti PA, De Iaco P, Tosti G, Patrizi A, et al.
Dermoscopic findings of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: A series of four cases. Br J Dermatol 2017;176:227-30.
Rogers T, Pulitzer M, Marino ML, Marghoob AA, Zivanovic O, Marchetti MA. Early diagnosis of genital mucosal melanoma: How good are our dermoscopic criteria? Dermatol Pract Concept 2016;6:43-6.
Blum A, Simionescu O, Argenziano G, Braun R, Cabo H, Eichhorn A, et al.
Dermoscopy of pigmented lesions of the mucosa and the mucocutaneous junction: Results of a multicenter study by the international dermoscopy society (IDS). Arch Dermatol 2011;147:1181-7.
Blum A, Beck-Zoul U, Held L, Haase S. Dermoscopic appearance of an amelanotic mucosal melanoma. Dermatol Pract Concept 2016;6:23-5.
Oakley A. Dermatoscopic features of vulval lesions in 97 women. Australas J Dermatol 2016;57:48-53.
Cinotti E, Tonini G, Perrot JL, Habougit C, Luisi S, Rubegni P. Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy features of two cases of vulvar basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Pract Concept 2018;8:68-71.
Kim JH, Kim MR, Lee SH, Lee SE, Lee SH. Dermoscopy: A useful tool for the diagnosis of angiokeratoma. Ann Dermatol 2012;24:468-71.
Jha AK, Sonthalia S, Jakhar D. Dermoscopy of angiokeratoma. Indian Dermatol Online J 2018;9:141-2.
] [Full text]
Errichetti E, Pegolo E, De Francesco V. Acquired lymphangiectasia of the vulva. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2015;13:237-9.
Errichetti E, Lacarrubba F, Micali G, Stinco G. Dermoscopy of zoon's plasma cell balanitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016;30:e209-10.
Lacarrubba F, Verzì AE, Ardigò M, Micali G. Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy, dermatoscopy and histopathological correlation of common inflammatory balanitis. Skin Res Technol 2018;24:499-503.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
|This article has been cited by|
||International Dermoscopy Society criteria for non-neoplastic dermatoses (general dermatology): validation for skin of color through a Delphi expert consensus
| ||Enzo Errichetti, Balachandra S. Ankad, Abhijeet K. Jha, Sidharth Sonthalia, Bengu N. Akay, Roberto Bakos, Yasmeen J. Bhat, Manal Bosseila, Ralph Braun, Horacio Cabo, Emilia N. Cohen Sabban, Manas Chatterjee, Maryam Daneshpazhooh, Deepak Jakhar, Feroze Kaliyadan, Awatef Kelati, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Shekhar Neema, Ahmed Sadek, Gabriel Salerni, David L. Swanson, Trilokraj Tejasvi, Richard Usatine, Aimilios Lallas |
| ||International Journal of Dermatology. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Authors’ reply: Comment on: Vulvar basal cell carcinoma: clinical features and treatment outcomes from a tertiary care centre
| ||RP Namuduri, TY Lim, PK Yam, R Gatsinga, SK Lim-Tan, SH Chew, MJ Koh, S Mansor |
| ||Singapore Medical Journal. 2020; 61(3): 168 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|