Indian J Sex Transm Dis Indian J Sex Transm Dis
Official Publication of the Indian Association for the Study of Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Indian J Sex Transm Dis
The Journal | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Login    Users online: 294   Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-45
 

Vaginal discharge: The diagnostic enigma


1 Junior Resident, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Professor and Head, Depatment of Microbiology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission12-Nov-2018
Date of Decision03-Dec-2018
Date of Acceptance22-Dec-2019
Date of Web Publication31-Jul-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. G Jyothi Lakshmi
Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Osmania Medical College, 5-1-86 Turrebaz Khan Road, Troop Bazaarkoti, Hyderabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijstd.IJSTD_92_18

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background: Vaginal discharge is a common clinical problem with varied etiologies, most common being bacterial vaginosis which presents as homogenous gray discharge caused by overgrowth of facultative and anaerobic bacterial species, next common is vulvovaginal candidiasis characterized by pruritus and cottage cheese like discharge followed by vaginal trichomoniasis associated with copious yellow or green and frothy discharge. This necessitates the need to identify the specific cause of vaginal discharge. Aim: To determine the etiology of pathological vaginal discharges in women attending tertiary care hospital. Methodology: 698 sexually active females in age group of 15 to 65 years with complaints of vaginal discharge attending Department of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy at a Tertiary care hospital from June 2017 to May 2018 participated in the study. After presumptive clinical diagnosis vaginal discharge was collected. Wet mounts and 10% KOH preparations were examined immediately. Identification of pathogens was done by Gram stain and culture. Results: 18.33% of 698 patients showed vulvovaginal candidiasis, 13.75% had bacterial vaginosis, 1.86% showed trichomoniasis. Gold standard was considered to be culture for candidiasis & trichomoniasis whereas for bacterial vaginosis it was Nugent's score. Conclusions: Vaginal discharge is of multiple yet specific etiologies hence simple and minimal tests like microscopy available in most laboratories (supported by culture wherever possible) would help in accurate diagnosis without over or under treatment of patient due to the empirical therapy. Syndromic management of STIs (WHO guidelines) should be used only in non-specific cases.


Keywords: Bacterial vaginosis, non-albicans Candida species, pathological vaginal discharge, trichomoniasis, vulvovaginal candidiasis


How to cite this article:
Amrin SS, Lakshmi G J. Vaginal discharge: The diagnostic enigma. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2021;42:38-45

How to cite this URL:
Amrin SS, Lakshmi G J. Vaginal discharge: The diagnostic enigma. Indian J Sex Transm Dis [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 12];42:38-45. Available from: https://www.ijstd.org/text.asp?2021/42/1/38/315401



   Introduction Top


Vaginal discharge is a common clinical condition with varied etiologies. Vaginal flora is a dynamic ecosystem that can be easily altered. The vagina, ectocervix, and endocervix are all susceptible to various pathogens, depending on its epithelium and other factors in the microenvironment. The squamous epithelium of the vagina and ectocervix is susceptible to Candida species and Trichomonas vaginalis, whereas the columnar epithelium of the endocervix is susceptible to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Herpes simplex virus may infect both types of epithelium. Earlier vaginal discharge was managed under the umbrella of “non-specific vaginitis.” At present, knowledge of individual pathogens makes treatment more specific.

Vaginitis resulting from bacterial (bacterial vaginosis [BV]), fungal (vulvovaginal candidiasis [VVC]) or protozoan infections (trichomoniasis) can be associated with altered vaginal discharge, odor, pruritus, vulvovaginal irritation, dysuria, or dyspareunia. The modern management of vaginal discharge demands a specific diagnosis, which is a combination of naked eye examination and laboratory workup of the vaginal discharge.


   Materials and Methods Top


A prospective, observational study was undertaken over a period of 12 months from June 2017 to May 2018 in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic and STD laboratory, in South India.

Study population

The study population consisted of a total of 698 women with complaints of vaginal discharge who were eligible and consented for the study during the study period after administering inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Sexually active reproductive age group women between 15 and 65 years presenting to the STD clinic with complaints of vaginal discharge
  2. Willing to be a part of the study with informed consent.


Exclusion criteria

Pregnant and lactating women, postmenopausal women, and women with genital or cervical malignancy and on treatment were excluded from the study.

Method of the study

A consecutive sampling method with zero intervals was followed in the consenting order.[1],[2] A detailed clinical history of the patient was obtained;

Cusco's speculum was introduced per vaginally and high vaginal swabs obtained from the posterior fornix for

  1. Wet mount of samples with normal saline and 10% of KOH
  2. Gram stain
  3. Culture: high vaginal swabs were inoculated on


    • Sabouraud's dextrose agar and chromagar for Candida at 25°C which were further processed on cornmeal agar for species confirmation
    • Kupferberg medium for T. vaginalis
    • Chocolate and blood agar for N. gonorrhoea.



   Results Top


Of the total 698 patients, based on history and clinical examination, 120 patients were suspected of candidiasis, 212 patients were suspected of BV, and 9 patients were suspected of trichomoniasis. Ninety-six patients were found to have physiological and 261 were found to have nonspecific vaginitis through clinical diagnosis alone.

Microbiological confirmation was obtained in 237 samples out of 698. One hundred twenty-eight (18.33%) of these had VVC, 96 (13.75%) had BV, and 13 (1.86%) had trichomoniasis [Table 1].
Table 1: Percentage of vulvovaginal candidiasis, clue cells, bacterial vaginosis, and trichomoniasis through clinical suspicion, wet mount, Gram stain, and culture

Click here to view


Microscopy

Wet mount findings

The vaginal discharge collected from posterior fornix was mixed with a drop of normal saline and another preparation with 10% KOH and examined for

  • Highly refractile round or oval budding yeast-like cells with pseudohyphae seen in case of candidal vaginitis in 102 patients [Figure 1]
  • The presence of clue cells which are vaginal epithelial cells with granular surface and blurred margins because of the attached bacteria were found in 60 patients suggestive of BV [Figure 2]
  • Jerky movements of flagellate protozoans were observed within 15 min to ½ h in trichomoniasis, in 10 patients [Figure 3] and [Video 1].
Figure 1: Candida species on wet mount

Click here to view
Figure 2: Clue cell on wet mount

Click here to view
Figure 3: Trichomonas vaginalis on wet mount

Click here to view





Gram stain of discharge showed:

  • Gram-positive budding yeast cells with pseudohyphae suggestive of Candida species in 125 of total Gram stained smears [Figure 4]
  • Certain species such as Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata and Candida krusei could be presumptively diagnosed on Gram's smear due to the difference in their sizes and shapes. Culture was performed for confirmation
  • One hundred and sixteen Gram-stained samples were found to have epithelial cells with granular surface and blurred margins because of the attached bacteria (clue cells) with marked reduction of Gram-positive lactobacilli [Figure 5]
  • Nugent scoring system was used to diagnose BV which was consistent with 96 of the total smear.
  • Five of the total Gram stains showed T. vaginalis [Figure 6]
  • Intracellular and extracellular Gram-negative diplococci suggestive of N. gonorrhoea were looked for.
Figure 4: Gram positive budding yeast cells with pseudohyphae on Gram stain

Click here to view
Figure 5: Clue cell on Gram stain

Click here to view
Figure 6: Trichomonas vaginalis on Gram stain

Click here to view


Culture growth

Sabou raud's dextrose agar, chromagar, and cornmeal agar

Culture on (Sabaroud's dextrose agar) SDA was identified by colony morphology and Gram stain, showing various Candida species. For the confirmation of C. albicans, germ tube formation was demonstrated; further, colonies on CHROMagar (Himedia) showing specific colored growth for each species were identified [Figure 7]. Colonies on cornmeal agar were studied under ×10 and ×40 for demonstration of the characteristic chlamydospores of each species [Table 2] and [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12].
Figure 7: Various Candida species on CHROMagar showing characteristic color and colony morphology

Click here to view
Figure 8: Candida glabrata on cornmeal agar characterized by the absence of chlamydospores, hyphae, or pseudohyphae

Click here to view
Figure 9: Candida albicans on cornmeal agar showing terminal single chlamydospores

Click here to view
Figure 10: Candida tropicalis on cornmeal agar showing sub/nonterminal chlamydospores arranged in clusters or singly

Click here to view
Figure 11: Match sticks appearance of Candida krusei on cornmeal agar

Click here to view
Figure 12: Sage bush/spider web appearance of Candida parapsilosis on cornmeal agar

Click here to view
Table 2: Characteristics of various Candida species on wet mount, Gram stain, CHROMagar, and cornmeal agar

Click here to view


In the present study, C. glabrata (36%), C. albicans (29%), Candida tropicalis (28%), C. krusei (6%), and C. parapsilosis (1%) were found to be the common causes of VVC in the decreasing order of occurrence.

Kupferberg medium

Culture growth on Kupferberg medium [Figure 13] was confirmed by wet mounts performed on day 2, 5, and 7 which were examined for motile trichomonads, and serial subcultures were done for further confirmation. Thirteen of the total samples showed T. vaginalis.
Figure 13: Kupferberg medium uninoculated medium on left, inoculated medium on right

Click here to view


Chocolate agar medium

Chocolate agar was examined for translucent to transparent dew-drop-like colonies showing Gram-negative diplococci in chains. In this study group of 698 patients, we could not isolate N. gonorrhoea.


   Discussion Top


The etiology of vaginal discharge was identified in all the consenting women aged between 15 and 65 years attending STD clinic and regional STD laboratory of a tertiary hospital, after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The following observations were made:

In the present study, the diagnosis of BV by clinical suspicion was higher than microbiological diagnosis, while the prevalence of Candida and trichomoniasis was better by microbiological diagnosis versus clinical approach. Thus, clinical diagnosis was found to have higher sensitivity for diagnosing BV and moderate sensitivity for trichomoniasis and candidiasis.[3]

In this study, a maximum number of women showing pathological discharge by microbiological confirmation were found to be in the reproductive and childbearing age group with most of them suffering from VVC followed by BV. In contrast, several studies such as Rao et al.,[4] Puri et al.,[5] Vijaya et al.,[3] Rekha et al.,[6] and Ananthula et al.[7] showed BV to be more common than candidiasis. This could be due to the use of empirical and over the counter antibiotics in the present study population.

One common finding seen across all these studies and further confirmed by our study is that the highest number of discharges is seen in the initial part of the onset of sexual and reproductive activity age, i.e., between 21 and 25 years and slightly declines during 25–44 years. This study further shows that as the age advances, the number of patients complaining of vaginal discharge decreases [Table 3]. This was attributed to increased awareness on sexual health and experience, thus allowing the women to follow sexual and reproductive hygiene and safer sex practices.
Table 3: Bar graph showing distribution of vulvovaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis and Trichomonas vaginitis across various age groups

Click here to view


Among the study group, a majority of pathological discharges are seen in the age group of 19–25 years, followed by 25–40 years. The same pattern is seen in both candidal vaginitis and BV but trichomoniasis was seen more in number in elderly patients >45 years [Table 3], which was similar to Ananthula et al.[7]

Vulvovaginal candidiasis

In this study, 18.33% of the patients were found to have VVC, which was in agreement with Vijaya et al.[3] Holland et al.,[8] Sowjanya et al.,[9] and Mohanty et al.[10] The present study showed VVC to be more common than BV unlike Rao et al.,[4] Puri et al.,[5] Vijaya et al.,[3] Rekha et al.,[6] and Ananthula et al.[7]

The present study showed non-albicans Candida species to be more common (71% in total) than Candida albicans (29%) with Candida glabrata (36%) being highest in number, which was similar to Ahmad A et al, Kumari et al and Swarajya Lakshmi et al.[11],[12],[13] This was followed by C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis, which was in close agreement with Kalaisaran et al.[14] and Swarajya Lakshmi et al.[13] Further, we found Gram stain (17.9%) to be almost as accurate as culture (18.33%) in the diagnosis of VVC. Wet mount (14.6%) was found to be less sensitive compared to Gram stain or culture [Table 4], which was similar to Ahmad and Ahmad and Khan[11] (15.9%). Esmaeilzadeh et al.[15] on the other hand showed it to be 27.84%. The difference in sensitivity of direct microscopy may be due to the difference in the concentration of yeast in different vaginal secretions.
Table 4: Diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, Trichomonas vaginal by wet mount, Gram stain and culture

Click here to view


Emergence of non-albicans species might be due to widespread and inappropriate use of antimycotic treatment in the form of self-medication, long-term maintenance treatments and repeated treatments for candidiasis episodes, and the use of single-dose oral and topical azoles. C. albicans eradication by these means results in the selection of species such as C. glabrata that are resistant to commonly used agents.[12]

Bacterial vaginosis

About 13.7% of the patients were diagnosed with BV in the present study. This study also confirms that Nugent's scoring is more specific and highly sensitive in diagnosis of BV.[4],[16] Rao et al.[4] diagnosed 17.4% cases of BV which was similar to our study. Few other studies such as Ananthula et al.,[7] Puri et al.,[5] Vijaya et al.,[3] and Rekha et al.[6] showed a higher prevalence of BV, this could be due to relatively small sample sizes in all these studies compared to the present study.

The present study shows that Gram stain is better at the detection of clue cells which are characteristic of BV compared to wet mount which gave many false negatives [Table 4]. About 16.61% (116 patients) of all the Gram stains showed clue cells and 96 of them were diagnosed with BV, thus confirming that the presence of clue cells is the single most reliable predictor of BV.[4]

In the present study, clue cells were found to be 100% sensitive and 90% specific in the diagnosis of BV which was similar to Mahadani et al.[17] who found clue cells to be 100% sensitive and 95.25% specific, whereas Modak et al.[18] found it to be 100% sensitive and 76% specific. Gupta et al.[19] found clue cells in only 61% of the cases symptomatic for BV. This study further validates that simple Gram staining of vaginal smears has very good sensitivity of 89%–93%.[20],[21]

Trichomonas vaginitis

About 1.86% of the total patients had trichomoniasis which was in agreement with Rao et al.,[4] Puri et al.,[5] Vijaya et al.,[3] and Rekha et al;[6] on the other hand, Muthusamy and Elangovan[22] showed it to be 6.15%, Madhivanan et al.[23] found it to be 8.5%, and Ananthula et al.[7] showed a very high prevalence of 18%.

The present study shows that though culture is the gold standard for diagnosis of T. vaginalis, prompt wet mount examination of vaginal discharge within 15 min is highly sensitive showing motile trichomonads after which motility decreases exponentially, similar findings were reported by Muthusamy and Elangovan[22] and Akujobi et al.[24]

Taking culture as the gold standard our study found the sensitivity of wet mount to be 77% in the detection of trichomoniasis, which was similar to that found by Ananthula et al.[7] (88.8%), Thomason et al.[25] (86%), and Akujobi et al.[24] (88.6%). Gram stain was found to be a poor tool for the detection of trichomonas.

Culture is more sensitive than wet mount preparation [Table 4] because of the lower minimum concentration of organisms required for a positive result and delay in examining the samples resulting in decreased motility.[26]


   Conclusion Top


The present study shows that BV would be overtreated, while candidiasis and trichomoniasis would be under treated if the management was started based on clinical diagnosis alone; thus, it confirms the need to identify the etiological agents in the diagnosis of vaginal discharge whenever possible and instituting accurate treatment rather than giving empirical treatment proposed by the syndromic approach of the WHO which often leads to considerable loss of resources and time due to over management. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics inadvertently causes alteration of normal vaginal flora with the potential of increasing the antibiotic resistance in the community.

In a low-resource setting, primary clinical diagnosis based on simple microscopy, i.e., Gram stain in case of VVC and BV and wet mount in case of trichomoniasis, supported further with culture wherever possible would be a more efficient management strategy.

The present study also points toward an increasing need to speciate Candida infections due to an increasing emergence of non-albicans Candida species, as these are often resistant to routine drugs and may further affect the management strategy in these patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Manual of Operating Procedures for Diagnosis of STIs/RTIs. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/documents/operational-guidelines. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 09].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Guidelines for the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/pub6/en/. [Last accessed on 23 Feb 2020].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Vijaya D, Patil Sunil S, Sambarey Pradip W. Clinical and microscopic correlation of vaginal discharge. Int J Contemporary Med Res 2016;3:1328-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Rao PS, Devi S, Shriyan A, Rajaram M, Jagdishchandra K. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a rural setup: Comparison of clinical algorithm, smear scoring and culture by semiquantitative technique. Indian J Med Microbiol 2004;22:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Puri KJ, Madan A, Bajaj K. Incidence of various causes of vaginal discharge among sexually active females in age group 20-40 years. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:122-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Rekha S, Jyoti S. Comparison of visual, clinical and microbiological diagnosis of symptomatic vaginal discharge in reproductive age group women. Int J Pharm Biomed Res 2010;4:144-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ananthula VK, Prasad JV, Katikala S, Godha VR, Pinjala P, Prasad K. et al. Clinical and aetiological pattern of vaginal discharge in patients attending STD clinic of a tertiary hospital. j Evolution Med Dent Sci 2017;6:4741-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Holland J, Young ML, Lee O, Chen SC, Sharon. Vulvovaginal carriage of yeasts other than Candida albicans. Sex Transm Infec 2003;79:249-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sowjanya R, Prathyusha V, SaiSreeSudha R. Comparative study of visual, clinical and microbiological diagnosis of white discharge. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:24-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mohanty S, Xess I, Hasan F, Kapil A, Mittal S, Tolosa JE. Prevalence susceptibility to fluconazole of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis. Indian J Med Res 2007;126:216-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Ahmad A, Khan AU. Prevalence of Candida species and potential risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aligarh, India. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144:68-71.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kumari V, Banerjee T, Kumar P, Pandey S, Tilak R. Emergence of non-albicans Candida among candidal vulvovaginitis cases and study of their potential virulence factors, from a tertiary care center, North India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2013;56:144-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Swarajya Lakshmi M, Jyothi Lakshmi G. Vulvo vaginal candidiasis: Importance of species identification. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2014,;03:788-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kalaiarasan K, Singh R, Chaturvedula L. Fungal Profile of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:DC06-DC09.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Esmaeilzadeh S, Omran SM, Rahmani Z. Frequency and etiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis in women reffered to gynaecological center in Babol, Iran. Int J Fertil Steri 2009;3:74-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:297-301.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mahadani JW, Dekate RR, Shrikhande AV. Cytodiagnosis of discharge per vaginum. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1998;41:403-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Modak T, Arora P, Agnes C, Ray R, Goswami S, Ghosh P, et al. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in cases of abnormal vaginal discharge: Comparison of clinical and microbiological criteria. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011;5:353-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Gupta BK, Kumar R, Sofat R, Khurana S, Deepinder. The role of Gardnerella vaginalis in nonspecific vaginitis in intra uterine contraceptive device users. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1998;41:67-70.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Hayes R, Wawer M, Gray R, Whitworth J, Grosskurth H, Mabey D. Randomised trials of STD treatment for HIV prevention: Report of an international workshop. HIV/STD Trials Workshop Group. Genitourin Med 1997;73:432-43.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Mazzulli T, Simor AE, Low DE. Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1506-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Muthusamy S, Elangovan S. A study on the prevalence of genital trichomoniasis among female outpatients attending sexually transmitted infection clinic in a tertiary care hospital. J Lab Physicians 2017;9:16-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Madhivanan P, Bartman MT, Pasutti L, Krupp K, Arun A, Reingold AL, et al. Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among young reproductive age women in India: Implications for treatment and prevention. Sex Health 2009;6:339-44.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Akujobi CN, Ojukwu CL. Comparison of saline wet preparation, Giemsa staining and culture methods for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis. AfrJ Clin Exp Microbiol 2006;7:208-11.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Thomason JL, Gelbart SM, Wilcoski LM, Peterson AK, Jilly BJ, Hamilton PR. Proline aminopeptidase activity as a rapid diagnostic test to confirm bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:607-11.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ohlemeyer CL, Hornberger LL, Lynch DA, Swierkosz EM. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in adolescent females: InPouch TV culture versus wet-mount microscopy. J Adolesc Health 1998;22:205-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (2,617 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed208    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal